Attorneys Friend or Foe ??? Attorney, the trappers Agent?

1950 81st Congress Investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and ran by communists under definition. Thus any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the American people.

America’s lawyers are controlled by the judges, and don’t really work for you – that’s why they sell you out to the government, or to the big companies that pay bribes.

In the future I hope to reveal how one local man went to his niece (working for a major law firm in Omaha) and asked her to represent him against an ‘failure to file’ case with the IRS.  After consulting with her superiors at the law firm she returned and said; “Yes I can represent you but I am instructed to lose the case, we are not allowed to prevail against the IRS (Government).”

American lawyers are directly under the thumb of the judges and the government, and must submit to the culture of bribery and perversion of justice, or else face terrifying revenge. Lawyers, just like you, can be instantly jailed by an American judge on flimsy pretexts, and American lawyers can be quickly stripped of their right to practice law, and personally and financially destroyed, if they dare to criticize legal corruption. Lawyers who try to fight the system can find themselves not only dis-barred, but also criminally charged and jailed, and no other lawyer will help them. It is a horribly crooked system in America.

This is different from other advanced countries, where lawyers are usually a professional guild, whose status and right to practice law, is under the control of only their fellow lawyers. This means that, in other countries, the judges and the government cannot easily ruin or attack the lawyers for purely political reasons. This is also part of why, in other developed countries, outside of America, you really do see brave lawyers fighting for un-popular clients, or challenging the government, and asking for justice.

But in America, it’s different. Over the past century, the American lawyers lost the right to regulate themselves, and instead fell under the power of the judges. So American lawyers are afraid to do things in court, that the judges don’t want them to do. America’s army of nearly 1 million lawyers, is almost totally under the control of a few thousand judges, with their entrenched culture of bribery and fraud and miscarriage of justice.

Some USA lawyers don’t like this, but they are helpless and can’t fight it. Most lawyers in America have, to one degree or another, signed up with the devil, to do things the way the devil wants them done.
That means that any time you hire an American lawyer, he already is in a conflict of interest. He has to make the judge happy first. And if the judge wants to make the government happy, or make somebody else happy who is paying a big bribe, then guess what? You are destroyed. It doesn’t matter what you paid the lawyer. He works for the judge, first and foremost.

So a totally unique factor in USA legal corruption is the amazingly dishonest profession of American lawyers, these lawyers who “play the game” with America’s judges and politicians and police. It is a savage culture of legal fraud, where lawyers work with judges to rob and terrify people, especially minorities, but also foreigners, and above all those who dare to question the system.

People accused of serious crimes have the “right” to a lawyer, but this may mean only a crooked lawyer who is stage-managing the victim to help the government and prosecutors. If the lawyer does not help the government, he can be put out of work and not “assigned” to any more cases, or treated badly the next time he is in a courtroom. This legal fraud is the core of the danger to those who visit America. A lawyer who is “representing” you in the USA, whether the government is paying him, or even if you are paying him yourself, may just be a stooge who is helping the prosecutors to put you in jail, even though you are innocent.

The judges of America gave every accused criminal the “right” to a lawyer, not because they cared about the rights of the accused, but because it helps stage-manage the victim, with a lawyer who has to do things the judge’s way. In America, such government-appointed lawyers are the means by which hundreds of thousands of poor people are railroaded into prison. Some of these people were just foreign tourists, in the wrong place at the wrong time, and wound up rotting in an American prison.

Some lawyers are fairly subtle about it, and their victims never realize the lawyer has sold them out to the judge and the government. Most American court cases never go to trial, never see a jury; it is the job of the victim’s lawyer to “sell the deal” that the judge has decided will happen, or else. This is how people accept a “plea bargain” so they accept going to jail for 3 years even though they are innocent, instead of going to trial before a jury.

Because of the corruption of lawyers under the thumb of the judges, there’s a very fake and phony aspect of court proceedings in America. They are really fake “show trials” in many cases, sometimes very obviously so, where both purported “sides” of lawyers are actually working together for the government, or for the big corporation or rich person that is bribing the judge.

Another true story which will be presented is about a young lawyer who just spent $100K to get a law degree and soon after he started representing a few of his friends in court the judge called him in to his chambers and ordered him to lose the case.  The man was shocked and terrified, but fully aware of the power of the judges to destroy not only him but the firm he worked with.  After a short irrational discourse with himself he yielded and his friends went to jail, with the full knowledge he had all the evidence to prove that they were innocent.  A short time later his conscience caught up with him and also the fact that he was a part of a vastly criminal enterprise he dropped his law practice and went back to farming.  Oh how sad. 

Yes lawyer tell me the same story occasionally, and then they most often encourage me to keep fighting
because they say; “You can present arguments that I can not with out being black-listed”, then they say I can not be seen talking to you.     Another lawyer testified against the government and he has been bared from 13     (I believe) states as to practicing law, he claims that they (government) keep following him and prompting each consecutive state to pull his permission to practice law in their state.   It is so sad what People, in authority, have allowed to come upon us. 

You will also find, in the American legal system, that you essentially have no recourse whatsoever against wrongdoing by your own lawyer. A lawyer can sell you out, betray you, steal your money, engage in malpractice, help out the other side, hide the evidence that proved you were right, or commit felony crime against you, and there is (almost) nothing you can do about it, so long as the lawyer made the judge happy, and the judge got his cut of any money the lawyer stole from you. (Stay tune for more.)<<< 

Things Hansen has Learned:
If you want to cut a deal, hire a lawyer.  If you want to win, study hard and speak for yourself.
Hansen nev

er yields to Latin > Legal-ease, stick with words that you know, and before you answer question ask them for the definition they are using for key words in their question.
Example-Pro Se = appearing for themselves.
-Pro Per = appearing as themselves.            Believe me in a criminal case the judge will try to get you to agree to “Pro Se”.
Pro Se appearance gives the court ‘in personam’ jurisdiction.
Pro Per, the Plaintiff must prove up jurisdiction “if challenged”.
Appearance with an Attorney as representing you creates an automatic ‘in personam jurisdiction’ = not good.
>>
The court almost always force an attorney on me and every time they have hurt my case.  One time a judge even demanded that I have an attorney the next time I come before him, I assure you that this was done in hopes to guarantee by defeat.  I know now how to stop this.  I’ll give my stories of how the court appointed/forced attorney greatly damaged my defence.
>>
Your odds in US Federal Courts:
90% of those charged take a plea-bargain with a guilty plea. (Usually prompted by your high dollar attorney.)
The balance of 10% have a 90% conviction rate.                  (Most of these have an attorney.)
Leaves 1% that are found not-guilty.  My experience/research is that at the minimum 10% to 25% of the people going into Federal Court are 100% innocent. 

Many are convicted by their lack of ability to defend them-self in a court of law.  Basically the courts complicated procedure produces their own fate, but remember having an attorney almost guaranties even poorer results.
>>>

Attorneys are ‘

Officers of the Court’:
a. They owe their first obligation/allegence to the Court.
b. Second to the BAR association/buddies.
c. Third their clients.  Yes last, far last.  Do you think a local attorney is going to fight for you in anyway that may upset the king/guy in the robe. 

Any court-appointed defense attorney for indigent defendants can not win their case, period.  If you believe that the state/judicial system is going to make an addition (provide you with a lawyer) that insures many of their cases end in a loss, just jump on the Internet and see the thousands of innocent people that are convicted each year.  Did you know America has more people in jail than any nation in the world on a percentage bases.
>>>
$$$ CONTRACTING WITH AND ATTORNEY:  April 22, 2008.
Never prepay an attorney up front if you can at all help it.
I had one attorney take $1600.00 from me for what should have taken three hours at $100/hr.  The guy pumped up the hours every way he could.
He told me that he needed $1,600.00 just in case it goes to trial, it did not and he keep the money.
I have him in court now.  But what are the odds of another attorney/judge giving me a good judgment.  I’ll put the entire case on this site when it is done.
>>>
Side Notes Below:
And when you’ve got your

social security number you said ” I want some welfare, I want some workmen’s comp, I want, I want, I want … and you have my power of attorney to regulate and control me. I’m a fictitious entity. I’m not a human being anymore.” 

When you do that, you give the federal government power of attorney. Then the government gives it to their courts. You become a ward of the court. So, read what a ward of the court is:

Wards of court. Infants and persons of unsound mind … Their rights must be guarded jealously …
Black’s[Law Dictionary], Fifth Edition.

His [attorney] first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client, and whenever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter.   Corpus Juris Secundum, 1980 Ed.

Clients are also called “wards of the court” in regard to their relationship with their attorneys.
Corpus Juris Secundum, 1980 Ed.

Nobody here looks like an imbecile or and infant to me, but you claim you are, and the courts recognize you as such. That’s why you have to have an attorney, even if you object.
>>>
Attorneys were held in such low regard in England that the trade was abolished in 1873. The root of attorney is ‘attorn’ which means ” to agree to be tenant to a new owner or landlord of the same property”. This trade was firmly established in feodal law. as is the entire legal profession in America. The trade they practice must be “at Law” or in opposition to Law because what they do cannot fit within the 10 commandments.
-attorney c.1303, from O.Fr. aturne “(one) appointed,” pp. of aturner “to decree, assign, appoint,” from a- “to” + turner “turn,” from L. tornare (see turn). The legal L. form attornare influenced the spelling in Anglo-Fr. The sense is of “one appointed to represent another’s interests.” In English law, a private attorney was one appointed to act for another in business or legal affairs (usually for pay); an attorney at law or public attorney was a qualified legal agent in the courts of Common Law who prepared the cases for a barrister, who pleaded them (the equivalent of a solicitor in Chancery). So much a term of contempt in England that it was abolished by the Judicature Act of 1873 and merged with solicitor.

“Johnson observed that ‘he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney.’ ” [Boswell]

The double -t- is a mistaken 15c. attempt to restore a non-existent Latin original. Attorney general first
recorded 1533 in sense of “legal officer of the state” (1292 in Anglo-Fr.), from Fr., hence the odd plural (subject first, adjective second).

>>

“7 C.J.S. section 4.  Nature and Duties of Office.

An attorney is an officer of the court with an obligation to the
courts and the public as well as to his clients, and his duty is to
facilitate the administration of justice.  An attorney does not hold
an office or public trust, in the constitutional or statutory sense of
that term, and strictly speaking, he is not an officer of the state or
of a governmental subdivision thereof.  Rather, as held in many
decisions, he is an officer of the court, before which he has been
admitted to practice.  An attorney is not the court or one of its
ministerial officers, or a law enforcement officer.  He is, however,
in a sense an officer of the state, with an obligation to the courts
and to the public no less significant than his obligation to his
clients.  Thus, an attorney occupies a “dual position” which imposes
“dual obligations.”  His first duty is to the courts and the public,
not to the client, and wherever the duties his client conflict with
those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of
justice, the former must yield to the latter.  The office of attorney
is indispensable to the administration of justice and is intimate and
peculiar in its relation to, and vital to the well being of the
court.  An attorney has a duty to aid the court in seeing that actions
and proceedings in which he is engaged as counsel are conducted in a
dignified and orderly manner, free from passion and personal
animosities, and that all causes brought to an issue are tried and
decided on their merits only, to aid the court in seeing that justice
is done, and to aid any effort under the court’s direction to root out
corruption and fraud.  An attorney has also the duty to devote his
ability,   skill, and diligence along ethical and professional lines
to the interests of his client, and to refrain from entering into any
alliance or incurring any obligation connected with the litigation in
which he is engaged as counsel that would place him in a position
where his personal interests would be adverse to those of his
client.”  And;

Now all of you can see the truth that this . . .  “dual position and
obligation,” further deprives all American Citizen’s of their
substantive rights to the due process of law.  When before their
“tribunals” – the attorney’s . . . “first duty is to the courts and
the public, not to the client.”

Did any ATTORNEY ever ask you for a $________.00 for a RETAINER????

Did that ATTORNEY tell you that a RETAINER was and is only a GIFT and
a DONATION????

Did that ATTORNEY tell you that he or she is NOT obligated to do any
work for you on your case for the $5,000.00 to $10,000.00 RETAINER
that you just gave them thinking that you just gave them a DOWN
PAYMENT to WORK ON YOUR CASE????

A “retainer” is a sum of money paid by a client to secure an
attorney’s availability to work for a client.  The fee paid is
considered earned at the time of payment because the attorney is
entitled to  the money regardless of whether he actually performs any
services for the client, and the funds shall not be placed into the
attorneys trust account.  Baranowski v. State Bar, 154 Cal.Rptr. 752,
593 P.2d 613 (1979); and the Washington State Bar News, Committee
Reports, Formal Opinion No. 173.

The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar, supra, clearly
stated that: A “RETAINER IS A SUM OF MONEY PAID BY A CLIENT TO SECURE
AN ATTORNEYS AVAILABILITY TO WORK FOR A CLIENT.”
A RETAINER only pays for the AVAILABILITY of the attorney.
The FACT is that when you make an appointment to talk to an attorney
for a DUI, traffic ticket, domestic violence, driving without a
license, driving while intoxicated, negligent driving or any other
kind of case, they meet with you, they let you TALK for about 5 to 10
to 15 minutes and then they ask you for a $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 to a
$10,000.00 or more as a RETAINER so that you can secure their
availability only!  The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar,
supra,  clearly stated that . . . THE FEE PAID IS CONSIDERED EARNED AT
THE TIME OF PAYMENT BECAUSE THE ATTORNEY IS ENTITLED TO THE MONEY
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE
CLIENT, . . . and the funds shall NOT be placed into the attorneys
trust account.”
Wow, the attorneys are so stuck up and think that they are so above
us “peons” or “goy dogs”that you have to pay them for merely “gracing
you with their presence” and that they consider the RETAINER earned at
the time you are dumb enough to give it to them REGARDLESS OF WHETHER
HE OR SHE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE CLIENT!!!!