((This Looks good, but I, Paul Hansen, have not reviewed thoroughly.)
About the presumptions created by using the ssn (Social Security Number / Association) this is what I have found in the USC.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Application for ssn
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Only U.S. citizens and “lawful permanent residents†(aliens),à¨à´€ both of whom have in common a legal domicile within the United States (federalà¨à´€ terr.) can lawfully apply for a SSN and card (20 cfrà¨à´€ 422.104).
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€The regulation is found in title 20 of the CFR and theà¨à´€ name of the title is “Employee’s Benefitsâ€, for those who join the SS programà¨à´€ agree to “act†as federal “employees†from that point forward.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€SSA section 1101, containsà¨à´€ definitions of key terms used on the SS website indicating that a statutoryà¨à´€ U.S. citizen as used in the Act, means a person born in the District ofà¨à´€ Columbia or a federal terr. Or possession and domiciled there. The definition of the term does not includeà¨à´€ the states of the Union and, therefore, must be excluded.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Persons domiciled in states of the Union on other thanà¨à´€ federal terr. Are NOT eligible for SS because the S. Ct has indicated thatà¨à´€ Congress has NO LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION within states of the Union (Carter v.à¨à´€ Carter Coal Co, 1936)
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€A person born within and domiciled within states ofà¨à´€ the Union is classified as a “national†but not a “citizen†under federalà¨à´€ law. He is NOT a “U.S. citizen†under 8à¨à´€ USC 1401.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Because people born in and domiciled within states ofà¨à´€ the Union are neither “US citizens†under 8 usc 1401à¨à´€ nor “lawful permanent residentsâ€, which are “aliensâ€, then they do not qualifyà¨à´€ for the SS program. If they sign up,à¨à´€ then they must commit perjury on the SS-5 form by indicating they are U.S.à¨à´€ citizens.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€The reason the U.S. gov isà¨à´€ willing to “look the other way†by accepting unqualified applicants from statesà¨à´€ of the Union is because SS is the mainà¨à´€ method by which the IRS manufactures “taxpayersâ€, which are persons subject toà¨à´€ federal jurisdiction and the IRS subtitle A.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Offering of SS to people in states of the Union is anà¨à´€ enlargement of federal powers beyond what the Constitution authorizes overà¨à´€ citizens of the states who would otherwise be “foreign†and outside of theà¨à´€ jurisdiction of the fed.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€SCOTUS said that the states CANNOT consent to such anà¨à´€ enlargement of fed powers or the breakdown of the Separation of Powers that ità¨à´€ causes. If the State govà¨à´€ cannot do it then neither can the sovereign people inà¨à´€ the states without violating the Constitution and destroying the protectionà¨à´€ provided by the (presumed) Separation of Powers.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Any attempt to compel a person domiciled within aà¨à´€ state of the Union on other than federal terr. and protected by the Bill ofà¨à´€ Rights (Articles of Con), to sign up for Social Security or to have or to use aà¨à´€ SS number against their will and without their consent, and in violation of theà¨à´€ Separation of Powers Doctrine within the Constitution therefore constitutes:
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
- à¨à´€
- Conspiracyà¨à´€ Against rights in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and 18 USC 241.
- 2.à¨à´€ Violation of 42 usc 408
- Violationà¨à´€ of the Fourth Amendment right to privacy – since the information will beà¨à´€ used to track me and hunt me like an animal.
- Anà¨à´€ offense to my religious beliefs in violation of the first Amendment
- Compellingà¨à´€ me to comply with a law that I am not subject to.
- Enticementà¨à´€ into federal and state tax slavery in violation of the Thirteenthà¨à´€ Amendment, 42 usc 1994 and 18 usc 1581 and 18 usc 1589.
- Compelledà¨à´€ association in violation of the First Amendment, whereby I am beingà¨à´€ compelled to maintain a domicile within federal jurisdiction and beà¨à´€ subject to federal law, even though I otherwise would not be.
à¨à´€
à¨à´€
à¨à´€
à¨à´€
à¨à´€
à¨à´€
à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Not to mention violation of rights of free inhabitantà¨à´€ non-citizens.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€What are the legal consequences of participating inà¨à´€ SS?
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Legal status changes as follows:
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
- à¨à´€
- Signingà¨à´€ up for SS makes one into a “Trusteeâ€, agent and fiduciary of the US gov. under 26 usc 6903. The US gov isà¨à´€ a foreign corporation with respect to a state of the Union, but it becomesà¨à´€ a “domestic†corporation when we are acting as an “employee†and agent.
- The US gov is defined as a “federal corporation†in 28 usc 3002(15)(A):
à¨à´€
à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€title 28 – Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Part VI – Particular Proceedings
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Chapter 176 – Federal Debt Collection Procedure
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Subchapter A – Definitions and General provisions
à¨à´€ à¨à´€Sec. 3002 Definitions
à¨à´€ à¨à´€(15) “United States†means –
à¨à´€ à¨à´€(A) a Federal corporation;
à¨à´€ à¨à´€(B) an agency, department,à¨à´€ commission, board, or other entity of the US; or
à¨à´€ à¨à´€(C) an instrumentality of theà¨à´€ United States.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€3. The Trustà¨à´€ you are acting as a Trustee for is an “employee†of the United States gov within the meaning of the IRC under 26 cfr 31.3401©-1.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€4. You, whenà¨à´€ acting as a Trustee, are an “officer or employee†of a federal corporationà¨à´€ called the “United Statesâ€.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
- à¨à´€
- The legalà¨à´€ “domicile†of the Trust you are acting on behalf of is the “District ofà¨à´€ Columbia.â€
- The SSà¨à´€ number is the “trustee License Numberâ€. à¨à´€ Whenever you write your name anywhere on a piece of paper, andà¨à´€ especially in conjunction with your all caps name, such as “JOHN SMITHâ€,à¨à´€ you are indicating that you are acting in a Trustee capacity. The only way to remove such aà¨à´€ presumption is to black out the number or not put it on the form and thenà¨à´€ to correct whoever sent you the form or notice to clarify that you are notà¨à´€ acting as a Trustee or government employee, but as a natural person.
- As anà¨à´€ “officer or employee of a corporationâ€, you are the proper subject of theà¨à´€ penalty and criminal provisions of the IRC under:
à¨à´€
à¨à´€
à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€26 uscà¨à´€ 6671(b)
à¨à´€ à¨à´€26 uscà¨à´€ 7343
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
- à¨à´€
- The IRCà¨à´€ becomes enforceable against you without the need for implementingà¨à´€ regulations. The Following statutesà¨à´€ say that implementing regulations published in the Federal Register areà¨à´€ not required in the case of federal employees or contractors:
à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€5 uscà¨à´€ 553(a) (2)
à¨à´€ à¨à´€44 uscà¨à´€ 1505(a) (1)
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€9. à¨à´€ As a Trustee over the SS trust, you are a “public officer†engaged in aà¨à´€ “trade or business†as defined in 26 usc 7701(a)à¨à´€ (26). Consequently, the earnings of theà¨à´€ federal corporation you preside over as Trustee are taxable under the IRC. You are exercising the function of a “publicà¨à´€ office†because you are exercising fiduciary duty over payments paid to theà¨à´€ Fed. You are in business with Uncle Samà¨à´€ and essentially become a “Kelly Girlâ€. à¨à´€ Income taxes are really just the “profits†of the Social Security trustà¨à´€ created when you signed up for the program, which are “kicked back†to theà¨à´€ mother corporation called the “United States.â€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€10. à¨à´€ all items that you take deductions on under 26 uscà¨à´€ 162, earned income credit under 26 usc 32, or aà¨à´€ graduated rate of tax under 26 usc 1 becomeà¨à´€ “effectively connected with a trade or businessâ€, which is a codeword forà¨à´€ saying that they are public property, because a “trade or business†is aà¨à´€ “public officeâ€. This “trade orà¨à´€ business†then becomes a means of earning you “revenue†or “profit†as aà¨à´€ private individual, because it serves to reduce your tax liability as a Trusteeà¨à´€ filing 1040 returns for the SS Trust. à¨à´€ What the gov doesn’t tell you is that youà¨à´€ can’t reduce a liability you wouldn’t have if you had just been smart enough notà¨à´€ to sign up for SS.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€11. Therefore, whatever you takeà¨à´€ deduction on comes under the jurisdiction of the IRC, which is the vehicle byà¨à´€ which the “public†controls the use of your formerly private property. Every benefit has a string attached and inà¨à´€ this case the string is that you as Trustee and all property you donate forà¨à´€ temporary use by the Trust then comes under theà¨à´€ jurisdiction of the IRC and SSA.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€12. Your Trust employer is your new boss. As your new boss, it does not need     territorial jurisdiction over you. All it needs is “in remâ€à¨à´€ jurisdiction over the property you donated to the trust, which includes allà¨à´€ your earnings. All this property, whileà¨à´€ it is donated to a public use, becomes federal property under governmentà¨à´€ management. That is why the SSN isà¨à´€ assigned to all accounts; to track government property, contracts, andà¨à´€ employees.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€13. Because theà¨à´€ property already is government property while you are using it in connectionà¨à´€ with a “trade or business†(Trustee business) then you implicitly have alreadyà¨à´€ given the government permission to repossess that which always was theirs. That is why they can issue a “Notice of Levyâ€à¨à´€ without any judicial process and immediately and conveniently take custody of yourà¨à´€ bank accounts, personal property, and retirement funds: because they have theà¨à´€ mark of the Beast, The slave Surveillance Number on them, which means youà¨à´€ already gave them to your new benefactor and caretaker, the US gov.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€14. The US Govà¨à´€ does not need territorial jurisdiction over you in order to drag you in federalà¨à´€ court while you are acting as one of its Trustees and fiduciaries under 26 usc 6903. any matter relating to federal contracts, whether they areà¨à´€ Trust Contracts or federal employment contracts (with the “Trusteeâ€), may ONLYà¨à´€ be heard in a federal court. It is aà¨à´€ violation of the separation of powers doctrine for a state to hear a matterà¨à´€ which might affect the federal government. à¨à´€ Federal Jurisdiction over Trustees is indeed “subject matterà¨à´€ jurisdictionâ€, but it doesn’t derive primarily from the IRC. Instead it derives form the agency andà¨à´€ contract you maintain as a ‘Trusteeâ€:
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€American Jurisprudence, 2d
à¨à´€ à¨à´€United States
à¨à´€ à¨à´€42 Interest on claim [77 Am Jury 2d UNITED STATES]
à¨à´€ à¨à´€The interest to be recovered as damages for the delayedà¨à´€ payment of a contractual obligation to the United States is not controlled byà¨à´€ state statute or local common law. Inà¨à´€ the absence of an applicable federal statute, the federal courts must determineà¨à´€ according to their own criteria the appropriate measure of damage. State law may, however, be adopted as the federal lawà¨à´€ of decision in some instances.
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€15. The U. S. Supremes have always given wideà¨à´€ latitude to manage its own “employees†which includes both its Social Securityà¨à´€ Trusts and the Trustees who are exercising agency over the Trust and its corpusà¨à´€ or property. You better bow down andà¨à´€ worship you new boss: Uncle Sammy!
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€
à¨à´€ à¨à´€ à¨à´€ à¨à´€ à¨à´€
I truly appreciate the fact you are sharing your knowledge. I am currently in court regarding the right to travel. The local authorities in Idaho as well as in other states continue to drag people into court by writing citations. Our defense has been to file counterclaims against any and all agents and agencies including the STATE. Any information that have to settle these bills of attainder or contracts in court is greatly appreciated. Thank you and God bless.
Respectfully,
Lee
Assistant Organizer
Sons of the Republic-Idaho
208.570.xxxx (direct)
http://www.meetup.com/sons-of-the-republic-in-Idaho/members/11167993/
>>Recently we have been winning every case, (No Registration, License, Insurance) if you want the info it is 25$. Paul Hansen
http://imdb.com/name/nm0723491/
HI Paul,
So how does one get rid of the SS#? I believe my parents not knowing what they were
doing signed me up as a kid.
Thanks,
Bob
It is not your number so you can not get rid of it.
It belongs to the USA / IRS.
It can “NOT” be your number at any moment you chose, all one has to do is deny it as being yours, you must deny that it was never yours, and if ever asked you must state that you never “ever”, not even one time, have ever “used” that number.
Why you can say that is because if you were not given the implications (full disclosure) of the number how could it ever be legally yours.
So if you are in the witness chair this is the only words that MUST come out of your mouth; “that is not my number, I have never used the number, I do not agree to the use of the number.” If you say; “I use to use it now I do not”, that is an admission of free will use, you do not want to go there.
Hypothetically if you call yourself the Son of Abraham Lincoln, it does not make it true, in this case you have never been bound to any number for even one second for it was never attached legally to you.
Claiming/Using a SSN is claiming you are a willing subject (seeker of services) under the US government.
Paul John Hansen
P.S. Soon I’ll have sites up on how to get jobs, bank account, passports, drivers license, etc. with no SSN.