Fire Arm v. Shotgun v. Free Zone:
(((Are Hansen Comments)))
Facts of the case:
An Arkansas federal district court charged Jack Miller and Frank Layton with violating the National Firearms Act (“NFA”) (((Federal Law applies upon federal owned land, liken to a military base))) when they transported a sawed-off double-barrel 12-gauge shotgun (((US written law states that a shotgun/smooth bore barrel of less than 18 inches is prohibited))) in interstate commerce (((Interstate commerce is transportation from one federal zone to another federal zone.))). In part, Miller and Layton argued that the NFA violated their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The district court agreed and dismissed the case.
Question
Does the Second Amendment protect an individual’s right to keep and bear a sawed-off double-barrel shotgun?
Conclusion
The purpose of the Second Amendment was to maintain effective state militias; Congress could require registration of a 12-gauge sawed-off shotgun if carried across state lines (((interstate commerce))).
- No. The Supreme Court reversed the district court, holding that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual the right to keep and bear a sawed-off double-barrel shotgun. With Justice James Clark McReynolds writing for the majority, the Court reasoned that because the possession of a sawed-off double barrel shotgun does not have a reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, the Second Amendment does not protect the possession of such an instrument.
- (((I believe that a study of historical archives of the 2nd amendment would say little to nothing about the militia, and a lot about the ‘right‘ to possess any device you wish for defense. [Thus the bill of rights.] They should challenge if the location of the ‘firearm’ was in-fact evidence-able as being on a federal possession.))) Lawyer Hansen, freeinhabitant.info
About Paul John Hansen
Paul John Hansen
-Foremost I love the Lord, His written Word, and the Elect Family of God.
-My income is primarily derived from rental properties, legal counsel fees, selling PowerPoint presentations.
-I am a serious student of territorial specific law, and constitutional limitations of the US and STATE Governments.
-I have been in court over 250 times.
-I have received numerous death threats that appear as to come from NEBRASKA STATE agents.
-I have been arrested an estimated 8 times. Always bogus false warrants, misdemeanor charges. (Mostly Municipal Housing Codes, or related acts.)
-I file no Federal Income Taxes (1040 Form) since the year 2001. (No filings in any form.)
-I pay no State income taxes.
-I do not pay STATE sales tax on major purchases.
-I pay no COUNTY property taxes with out a judicial challenge. ( I believe I have discovered a filing for record process that takes my land off the tax roles. )
-I currently use no State drivers license, carry no vehicle liability insurance, do not register my automobiles.
-I do not register to vote for any representatives.
-I am a 'free inhabitant' pursuant to Article 4 of The Articles of Confederation. (Not a US citizen.)
-I am subject to the Church jurisdiction, and a strong advocate of full ecclesiastical independence from the United States jurisdiction.
-I believe in full support of the perpetual Union as found in the Articles of Confederation.
-I believe that a free inhabitant has the lawful standing to choose to live independent of the constitutional corporate US governments, and its statutory courts in the vast majority of his daily life, and to be forced to do otherwise is slavery.
-I believe that most all US written law is constitutional, but most all of that same law is misapplied upon jurisdictions where it has no force and effect of law and the bar association has perfected a system of keeping the people from knowing its true application. Order my 5$ presentation 'Free Inhabitant One A', for the truth in limited jurisdiction of all US written law.
